When considering the integration of PostgreSQL and MS Access, a compelling question arises: should one adopt the practice of representing Boolean true values as -1? This query stirs a multitude of considerations, particularly in the context of database design and the implications for data integrity. PostgreSQL employs a straightforward Boolean type, distinguishing between true and false with clarity, but MS Access often utilizes numeric representations. Could the choice of using -1 for true lead to potential confusion, especially for developers and database administrators who are accustomed to seeing Boolean values represented more transparently? Furthermore, what about the cascading effects this decision might have on querying, data manipulation, and reporting? Would such a representation complicate the understanding of the underlying data or introduce subtle bugs in the application logic? These are the kinds of inquiries that deserve careful contemplation and analysis. What do you think—should Boolean truths be wrapped in the guise of -1, or is there a more transparent alternative that could be embraced?